[2013] FWCA 3380 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/6579)
AUSTRALIAN PUMPING PLANT PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 29 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Australian Pumping Plant Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Australian Pumping Plant Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 5 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE401479 PR537325>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 3380
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3380
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements of the Fair Work Act. Procedurally, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether appropriate steps were taken to ensure genuine agreement. Substantively, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement included terms that were fair and reasonable, particularly in relation to minimum wages, penalties, and other employment conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not disadvantage any employee in a way that was not in their best interests.
In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was successful. The Commission determined that the agreement was made in good faith, with sufficient evidence of genuine consultation and negotiation between the parties. The terms of the agreement were also found to be fair and reasonable, providing adequate protections and benefits for employees while also accommodating the operational needs of the employer. The Commission emphasised that the agreement aligned with relevant industry standards and did not impose any undue burdens on the employer. Consequently, the enterprise agreement was approved, ensuring that the terms of employment for the affected workers would be governed by the agreed-upon conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.