Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2013] FWCA 5236


[2013] FWCA 5236

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/7711)

HARD ELEMENTS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011- 2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 31 JULY 2013

Application for approval of the Hard Elements Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011- 2015.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 24 July 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Hard Elements Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011- 2015(“the Agreement”).

[2] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act). However, as noted in that decision, I do not consider this to be a reason for not approving the Agreement.

[3] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.

  • Clauses 33.4 and 33.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 41 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 41 is as follows:


    • “The right provided for in subclause 33.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.

      The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 33.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”

[4] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr D. Hanna, Divisional Branch Secretary, of the CFMEU.

[5] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE402769  PR539622>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 5236
Case
[2013] FWCA 5236
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) and Hard Elements Pty Ltd, and pertains to an application for the approval of a collective agreement between the two parties for the period 2011-2015. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which is the tribunal responsible for regulating workplace relations in Australia.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement met the criteria for approval, including whether it was a genuine enterprise agreement, whether it was free from unlawful content, and whether it provided for proper dispute resolution mechanisms. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.

In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence and submissions provided by both parties, as well as relevant legal authorities. The Commission found that the proposed agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, and that it was free from unlawful content. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for proper dispute resolution mechanisms, and that it was in the best interests of the employees. However, the Commission noted that some of the terms and conditions of the agreement were not entirely fair and reasonable, and made several orders to amend the agreement accordingly. Ultimately, the Commission approved the agreement with the amended terms and conditions.

The Fair Work Commission approved the application for approval of the collective agreement, subject to certain amendments to the terms and conditions. The Commission found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, free from unlawful content, and in the best interests of the employees. However, the Commission also found that some of the terms and conditions were not entirely fair and reasonable, and made orders to amend the agreement accordingly. The approved agreement provides for proper dispute resolution mechanisms, and sets out the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of Hard Elements Pty Ltd for the period 2011-2015.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.