[2013] FWCA 7134 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/9347)
F.T.F PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 18 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the F.T.F Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 11 September 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the F.T.F Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015 (“the Agreement”).
[2] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act).
[3] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clauses 33.4 and 33.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 42 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 42 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 33.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 33.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404151 PR541986>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 7134
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7134
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address included the validity of the bargaining process, the content of the collective agreement, and whether it complied with the Fair Work Act’s provisions. Specifically, the court examined whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for the resolution of disputes, and whether it was consistent with the relevant national employment standards. The court also considered whether the CFMEU had the authority to negotiate on behalf of its members and whether the process was free from any undue influence or coercion.
In its reasoning, the court found that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith and that the agreement was consistent with the national employment standards. The court confirmed that the CFMEU had the authority to negotiate on behalf of its members and that the agreement was not made under duress or undue influence. The court also determined that the collective agreement contained provisions for the resolution of disputes and met all the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the court granted the application for approval of the collective agreement.
The final orders of the court were that the F.T.F Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act. The agreement was to be enforceable by the courts, and both parties were bound by its terms and conditions. This decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved and reinforced the importance of adhering to statutory requirements in collective bargaining processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.