[2013] FWCA 7815 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/10729)
WALLS STEEL FABRICATIONS PTY LTD & THE TRUSTEE FOR WALLS/MCPHEE TRUST T/AS JW SITE WORKS AND THE CFMEU RIGGER / STEEL ERECTOR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 8 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Walls Steel Fabrications Pty Ltd & The Trustee for Walls/McPhee Trust T/As JW Site Works and the CFMEU Rigger / Steel Erector Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Walls Steel Fabrications Pty Ltd & The Trustee for Walls/McPhee Trust T/As JW Site Works and the CFMEU Rigger / Steel Erector Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404616 PR542949>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 7815
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7815
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was a good faith bargain and if it complied with the provisions of the Act, including the requirement for it to be free from any provisions that might undermine the operation of a business. The Commission had to assess the submissions from both parties and consider the broader implications of the agreement on the employees, employers, and the industry.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was a genuine attempt at good faith bargaining. It noted that while there were some contentious issues, the overall terms of the agreement reflected a reasonable balance between the interests of the employees and employers. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not include any provisions that would undermine the operation of a business and was thus compliant with the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval was upheld, and the agreement was registered.
The Commission ordered that the CFMEU Rigger / Steel Erector Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act. This decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved, ensuring that the agreement could be implemented as intended.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.