| [2017] FWCA 5916 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/5233)
Sealco Sealants PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| Commissioner Gregory | MELBOURNE, 10 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Sealco Sealants PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sealco Sealants PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE426057 PR597634>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWCA 5916
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5916
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the assessment of whether the proposed Enterprise Agreement complied with the mandatory provisions of the Fair Work Act and if the agreement was made in good faith. Specifically, the CFMEU raised concerns about the provisions relating to casual employees' entitlements and the process by which the agreement was negotiated. The Commission had to determine if the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits to employees and whether the negotiation process was fair and genuine.
In its decision, the Commission examined the negotiation records and the content of the proposed agreement. It found that while some provisions were in line with the mandatory standards, certain aspects concerning casual employees did not meet the required protections under the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the negotiation process was generally in good faith, but the agreement needed amendments to ensure compliance with the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement with specific modifications to address the deficiencies identified, ensuring that it met the necessary legal standards for employee entitlements and conditions.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement with the stipulation that certain clauses be amended to meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The modifications included ensuring that casual employees' entitlements were in line with the mandated provisions, thereby upholding the integrity of the agreement and protecting employee rights.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.