[2013] FWCA 9228 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/11520)
ELITE INTERIOR SOLUTIONS PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 22 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Elite Interior Solutions Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Elite Interior Solutions Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 29 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405520 PR544911>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 9228
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9228
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, particularly whether it met the "better off overall test" (BOOT) which requires that employees be no worse off financially than they would be under their previous award or agreement. The Union raised concerns that certain provisions of the agreement, particularly those relating to penalty rates, could result in employees being worse off overall. The FWC needed to assess whether the agreement met the BOOT and other statutory requirements.
In its decision, the FWC considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. The FWC found that while some provisions of the agreement could result in employees being worse off in certain circumstances, the overall effect of the agreement was that employees would be better off. The FWC found that the agreement met the BOOT and other statutory requirements. The FWC also found that the agreement contained provisions that were beneficial to employees, such as increased leave entitlements and provisions for flexible working arrangements.
The FWC approved the agreement subject to certain modifications to address the Union's concerns. The modifications related to the calculation of penalty rates and the operation of certain provisions of the agreement. The FWC determined that the modified agreement met the BOOT and other statutory requirements and was therefore approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.