[2013] FWCA 9945 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/11923)
SECURE IT TEMPORARY FENCING PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 18 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Secure It Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 12 December 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Secure It Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015(“the Agreement”).
[2] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act).
[3] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clauses 33.4 and 33.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 41 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 41 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 33.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 33.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[4] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr D. Hanna, Divisional Branch Secretary, of the CFMEU.
[5] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[7] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405958 PR545862>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 9945
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9945
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue was whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Union argued that the agreement was necessary to protect workers who were not union members, while the company argued that the agreement imposed unnecessary and onerous obligations on it. The Commission had to determine if the agreement was in the interests of the workers and if it was necessary to protect them.
The Commission found that the agreement was in the interests of the workers and was necessary to protect them from unsafe working conditions. The agreement provided for the provision of personal protective equipment, training, and supervision, which were essential to ensure the safety of the workers. The Commission also found that the agreement did not impose any onerous obligations on the company and was therefore in compliance with the statutory requirements for approval. The application for approval of the agreement was granted.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Secure It Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015. The approval was granted on the condition that the agreement was to be registered with the Commission and that any variations to the agreement would also require approval from the Commission. The approval was effective from the date of the decision and was to remain in force until the end of the agreement period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.