Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2014] FWCA 990


[2014] FWCA 990

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/208)

ALLSCOPE COMMERCIAL INSTALLATIONS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 12 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Allscope Commercial Installations Pty Ltd and CFMEU union collective agreement 2011-2015.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 4 February 2014 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Allscope Commercial Installations Pty Ltd and CFMEU union collective agreement 2011-2015(“the Agreement”).

[2] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act).

[3] Additionally, sub clause 35.3 of the Agreement (“employment security, staffing levels, mode of recruitment and replacement labour”) equally raises enforceability questions. In this respect, I explained in a separate previous decision - [2013] FWC 5033 - that such a clause, as it purports to restrict or qualify the employer’s right to use contractors or utilise contracted labour, may not comprise permitted content for the purposes of s.172 of the Act.

[4] In relation to clause 41 of the Agreement (“visa compliance”) which refers to apparent obligations upon the employer to do certain things where “temporary foreign labour” is engaged, I note that a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission 1 has found that a clause in such terms as clause 41 of the Agreement is not permitted content (again, for the purposes of s.172 of the Act), and consequently, cannot impose the obligations upon the employer it seeks to impose.

[5] For the further avoidance of doubt, I note the following.

    ● Clause 3 notes that the Agreement is to apply to employees of the company engaged in construction work and/or for whom the Agreement provides classifications and rates of pay. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally, the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that this “and/or” should be read as “and”.

    ● Clauses 32.4 and 32.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 40 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 40 is as follows:

      “The right provided for in subclause 32.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.

      The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 32.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”

[6] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr P. Close, Assistant Divisional Branch Secretary, of the CFMEU.

[7] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[8] The consultation clause in the Agreement does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement and is attached to the Agreement.

[9] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

 1   Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Baulderstone Pty Ltd[2013] FWC 2671 (O’Callaghan SDP).

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE406803  PR547611>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCA 990
Case
[2014] FWCA 990
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) for the approval of a collective agreement with Allscope Commercial Installations Pty Ltd for the period 2011-2015. The primary dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the bargaining provisions and the fairness of the terms and conditions it contained.

The legal issues the court had to resolve included whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties, whether it contained permissible terms and conditions, and if it adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement unfairly discriminated against certain employees or breached any minimum standards set by the Fair Work Act.

The Commission concluded that the agreement was indeed genuinely negotiated and contained permissible terms and conditions. The court found that the parties had engaged in good faith bargaining, and the process was procedurally fair. The terms of the agreement were considered fair and reasonable, taking into account the nature of the industry and the specific circumstances of the employees. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the collective agreement was registered.

The final orders confirmed the registration of the Allscope Commercial Installations Pty Ltd and CFMEU union collective agreement for the period 2011-2015, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.