Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union Summary

[2014] FWCA 2559

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/5565)

ONLINE UPHOLSTERY (AUST) PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON	MELBOURNE, 16 APRIL 2014

Application for approval of the Online Upholstery (Aust) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Online Upholstery (Aust) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 April 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, the Court was presented with an application concerning the approval of the Online Upholstery (Aust) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015. The dispute arose from the union's request for the Fair Work Commission to approve the enterprise agreement, which was contested by certain parties. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, where the central issues revolved around the procedural fairness and the substantive fairness of the agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the court included whether the Fair Work Commission had correctly exercised its discretion in approving the enterprise agreement and whether the process followed was in line with the requirements of procedural and substantive fairness. Specifically, the court examined whether the Commission adequately considered all relevant factors and whether it had properly balanced the interests of the parties involved. Furthermore, the court had to determine if the agreement met the threshold criteria for approval as stipulated in the Act.

In delivering its judgment, the court found that the Fair Work Commission had indeed exercised its discretion correctly and had followed a process that was procedurally fair. The Commission had considered all relevant factors and had balanced the interests of the parties appropriately. The court also concluded that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. Therefore, the application for approval was upheld, and the enterprise agreement was approved as it stood.

The final orders of the court confirmed the approval of the enterprise agreement, with specific directions for the Commission to provide a detailed written account of its decision-making process to ensure transparency and accountability. The union and the employer were directed to abide by the terms of the approved agreement, which would govern the employment conditions of the workers in the building and construction industry.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established