Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2014] FWCA 5470


[2014] FWCA 5470
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/8558)

LUKE CANNARD CARPENTRY PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON

MELBOURNE, 12 AUGUST 2014

Application for approval of the Luke Cannard Carpentry Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Luke Cannard Carpentry Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE409562  PR554167>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCA 5470
Case
[2014] FWCA 5470
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the application for approval of the Luke Cannard Carpentry Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015, the Fair Work Commission was tasked with deciding whether the agreement should be approved. The dispute arose from a disagreement between the applicant employer and the union over the terms and conditions of employment outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement. The commission, acting under the Fair Work Act 2009, was required to determine whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including fairness and the protection of employees' rights.

The primary legal issues before the commission involved assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed agreement, ensuring it did not adversely affect employees' rights and entitlements, and confirming that it complied with relevant statutory provisions. The commission considered the bargaining process, the fairness of the terms proposed, and whether the agreement met the standards set by the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the commission had to determine whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and the employees.

The Fair Work Commission concluded that the proposed enterprise agreement was fair and reasonable. The commission found that the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, and it met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. The commission highlighted the thoroughness of the bargaining process and the fact that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees. Consequently, the commission approved the agreement, finding that it did not adversely affect employees' rights and was in line with the legislative requirements.

The final order of the Fair Work Commission was that the Luke Cannard Carpentry Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 be approved. The commission's decision confirmed the agreement as a valid and enforceable enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.