| [2014] FWCA 6236 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/8841)
DJM PROPERTY SERVICES PTY LTD & PJL SETTLEMENT T/AS ENVIRO AWARE PEST CONTROL AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 9 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the DJM Property Services Pty Ltd & PJL Settlement T/As Enviro Aware Pest Control and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DJM Property Services Pty Ltd & PJL Settlement T/As Enviro Aware Pest Control and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE409996 PR555224>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCA 6236
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6236
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the legal framework and the specific provisions of the agreement, as well as the evidence presented by the parties. The CFMEU argued that the settlement terms were fair and reasonable, while the respondent company contested certain provisions. After reviewing the submissions and evidence, the Commission concluded that the settlement terms met the statutory requirements and were fair and reasonable. The Commission found that the settlement was in the interests of fairness and equity and approved the terms, noting the benefits of resolving the dispute through negotiation and compromise.
The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the legal and factual context, ensuring that the settlement complied with the Fair Work Act and the enterprise agreement. The approval of the settlement facilitated a resolution of the dispute, reflecting the principles of fairness and equity. The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the settlement agreement, with specific terms and conditions outlined to ensure compliance with the relevant legal standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.