DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/10235)

SPEEDY CEILINGS & PARTITIONS PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014-2017

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN	SYDNEY, 13 JANUARY 2015

Application for approval of the Speedy Ceilings & Partitions Pty Ltd/ CFMEU Collective Agreement 2014-2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Speedy Ceilings & Partitions Pty Ltd/ CFMEU Collective Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent matter of Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, the applicant sought approval of a collective agreement between Speedy Ceilings & Partitions Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union for the years 2014 to 2017. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, an Australian statutory body established under the Fair Work Act 2009, which has jurisdiction to hear matters relating to workplace relations and industrial disputes.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the collective agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees covered by it, and whether it complied with the various provisions of the Act, including those relating to the protection of employees' rights and interests. The Commission also needed to consider the evidence presented by both parties regarding the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission found that the collective agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for minimum wages, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms, which were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that the employees had been adequately represented during the negotiation process. As a result, the Commission approved the collective agreement, finding that it met the statutory requirements for approval.

The Fair Work Commission's decision in this matter provides guidance to employers and unions on the requirements for approving collective agreements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission's findings on the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement are likely to be of particular interest to parties seeking to negotiate and approve similar agreements in the future. The decision also highlights the importance of ensuring that collective agreements are in the best interests of employees and comply with the relevant statutory provisions.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established