| [2018] FWCA 52 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2017/6501)
Cap Formwork Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2017-2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| Commissioner Gregory | MELBOURNE, 4 JANUARY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Cap Formwork Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2017-2018.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cap Formwork Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2017-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 January 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE426790 PR599224>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FWCA 52
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 52
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the provisions of the proposed collective agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. This included examining whether the agreement provided for the fair and equitable treatment of employees, and whether it adhered to the prescribed terms and conditions as outlined in the Act. The Commission also needed to assess whether the agreement met the threshold for public benefit, considering the impact on employees, employers, and the broader community.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the proposed agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that certain provisions, particularly those related to wage increases and penalty rates, were not consistent with the provisions of the Act. The Commission highlighted that the agreement did not provide for adequate consideration of the public interest, particularly in relation to the potential impact on the broader construction industry. As a result, the Commission refused to approve the agreement.
No specific final orders were mentioned in the decision. However, the refusal of approval meant that the existing collective agreement would continue to apply until a new agreement could be negotiated and approved by the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.