DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/304)

TONIC PROJECTS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2018

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 22 FEBRUARY 2016

Application for approval of the Tonic Projects Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2014 - 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tonic Projects Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2014 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 22 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 29 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of an application for approval of the Tonic Projects Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union Collective Agreement 2014-2018, the Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining the merits of the proposed agreement between the employer and the union. The primary issue before the court was whether the collective agreement complied with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was in the best interests of the employees involved.

The Fair Work Commission considered several key legal issues, including whether the agreement met the standards of good faith bargaining, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it aligned with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also examined whether the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees and whether it addressed the legitimate needs of both the employer and the union.

After careful consideration, the Fair Work Commission determined that the proposed collective agreement did not meet the necessary standards for approval. The Commission found that the agreement failed to adequately protect the rights of employees and did not align with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also noted that the agreement did not sufficiently address the legitimate needs of both the employer and the union. As a result, the Commission did not grant approval for the collective agreement. The decision was based on the Commission's finding that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval and was not in the best interests of the employees involved.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established