[2016] FWCA 1999
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union |
| (AG2016/681) |
GEIGER CIVIL PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE
AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 1 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Geiger Civil Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective
Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Geiger Civil Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement).
The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been
made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single
enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining
representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the
Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the
organisation.
[2016] FWCA 1999
[4] The Agreement was approved on 1 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 8 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE418415 PR578526>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 1999
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1999
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as outlined in sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act. The union, as a bargaining representative, had also notified the court that it wanted the agreement to cover its members. The court had to consider these factors to decide whether the agreement should be approved. The court found that the union had complied with the necessary requirements for approval and that the agreement was valid.
The court was satisfied that the union had met the criteria for approval of the enterprise agreement. The union had provided notice under section 183 of the Act that it wanted the agreement to cover its members, and the agreement covered the union's organisation. The court approved the agreement on April 1, 2016, and it will operate from April 8, 2016, with a nominal expiry date of July 2, 2019. The court concluded that the agreement met the necessary requirements for approval and that it should be approved. The agreement will now operate for the specified period and cover the union's members in the specified industries.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.