[2016] FWCA 2339
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union |
| (AG2016/846) |
THE TRUSTEE FOR STATEWIDE STEELFIXING TRUST T/A
STATEWIDE STEELFIXING (QLD) AND CFMEU UNION
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 13 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of The Trustee for Statewide Steelfixing Trust T/A Statewide
Steelfixing (QLD) and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The
Trustee for Statewide Steelfixing Trust T/A Statewide Steelfixing (QLD) and CFMEU Union
Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to
s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry,
Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining
representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the
Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the
organisation.
[2016] FWCA 2339
[4] The Agreement was approved on 13 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 20 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
| <Price code J, AE418576 PR579033> |
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 2339
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met, particularly focusing on whether the group of employees covered by the agreement were fairly chosen. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement appropriately covered the union, as required under section 183 of the Act. The court also needed to confirm that the agreement met the conditions for approval as outlined in section 201(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Commissioner Roe found that all relevant conditions for approval were satisfied. Although the agreement did not cover all employees of the employer, the Commissioner was satisfied that the group of employees covered by the agreement was fairly chosen, taking into account the factors specified in sections 186(3) and 186(3A) of the Act. Furthermore, the union had notified its desire for the agreement to cover it, which was in compliance with section 183 of the Act. The agreement was approved, and it was set to operate from 20 April 2016 until its nominal expiry date of 2 July 2019.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.