| [2016] FWCA 4535 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/3779)
ABD PERSONNEL PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 7 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the ABD Personnel Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ABD Personnel Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 July 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE419816 PR582513>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 4535
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4535
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the agreement to ensure it did not unfairly disadvantage employees, provided adequate protections, and was genuinely negotiated between the parties. A key aspect of the review was verifying that the agreement did not include terms that were contrary to public policy or that failed to meet the minimum standards set by the Act. The court also assessed whether the agreement was procedurally sound, including whether proper consultation and negotiation processes were followed.
After a thorough review, the court determined that the agreement substantially complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court found that the agreement was fair and balanced, providing adequate protections for employees while allowing for reasonable flexibility in the employment terms. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions. The final orders included the approval of the agreement with the specified conditions, ensuring that it would be registered and enforceable as a legally binding contract between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.