| [2016] FWCA 5375 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4728)
PRO PAINTING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 5 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the Pro Painting Australia Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as Pro Painting Australia Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 5 August 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 12 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE420344 PR583748>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 5375
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5375
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with evaluating whether the enterprise agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Act. This involved scrutinising the process through which the agreement was negotiated, including whether it was done in good faith and whether the necessary consultations were held. Additionally, the court had to ensure that the agreement did not adversely affect employees' job security and that it contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.
Upon review, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and adhered to the procedural requirements. The court also noted that the agreement did not negatively impact job security and included adequate provisions for dispute resolution. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding that it met all the necessary legal criteria. The approval was contingent upon the parties adhering to the terms of the agreement and ensuring that it would operate fairly and effectively within the workplace.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.