DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4903)

AIRPORT CEILINGS (VIC) PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 9 AUGUST 2016

Application for approval of the Airport Ceilings (Vic) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Airport Ceilings (Vic) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 9 August 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application for the approval of the Airport Ceilings (Vic) Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, where the parties disputed certain aspects of the proposed agreement. The primary focus of the dispute was on the fairness and compliance of the agreement with relevant industrial laws.

The legal issues the court had to decide revolved around whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as stipulated under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it adhered to the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements. The key points of contention included the classification of employees, the wage rates, and the inclusion of specific provisions related to working conditions and dispute resolution.

The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the evidence presented by both parties. It found that the agreement, while generally fair, contained some clauses that did not meet the statutory requirements. The court noted that the classification of certain employees was not consistent with the Fair Work Act, and adjustments were necessary. Additionally, some wage rates were deemed insufficient when compared to industry standards. However, after negotiations and revisions, the agreement was ultimately approved with certain modifications to ensure compliance with the law.

The final orders included the approval of the amended enterprise agreement with specific conditions to be met by the parties. The agreement was to be subject to ongoing monitoring to ensure continued compliance with industrial laws. The court mandated that any further disputes regarding the agreement would be resolved through the mechanisms established within the agreement itself. This decision underscored the importance of adhering to legislative frameworks in the formation of enterprise agreements.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established