| [2021] FWC 1958 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459—Protected action
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
v
Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk
(B2021/239)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BINET | PERTH, 13 APRIL 2021 |
Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2021/58.
[1] On 7 April 2021, the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (Application) pursuant to sub section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order.
[2] The protected action ballot order the subject of the Application was issued on 11 February 2021 in PR726894 (Order).
[3] The Order applies to certain employees of Qube Ports Pty Ltd trading as Qube Ports and Bulk (Qube).
[4] On 8 April 2021, Qube was advised of the Application and on 9 April 2021 confirmed to my Chambers they did not have any objection to the Application being granted and did not wish to be heard in relation to the Application. I have therefore determined the Application on the basis of the documentation filed by the CFMMEU.
[5] Section 459 of the FW Act provides as follows:
“s.459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
(1) Industrial action by employees is authorised by a protected action ballot if:
(a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and
(b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot; and
(c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and
(d) the action commences:
(i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or
(ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)--during the extended period.
Note: Under Division 2, industrial action by employees for a proposed enterprise agreement (other than employee response action) is not protected industrial action unless it has been authorised in advance by a protected action ballot.
(2) If:
(a) the nature of the proposed industrial action specified in the question or questions put to the employees in the protected action ballot included periods of industrial action of a particular duration; and
(b) the question or questions did not specify that consecutive periods of that industrial action may be organised or engaged in;
then only the first period in a series of consecutive periods of that industrial action is the subject of the ballot for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a).
(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
[6] The CFMMEU was the applicant for the Order and therefore has standing to make the Application.
[7] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 25 March 2021.
[8] Pursuant to sub-section 459(1)(d)(i) of the FW Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expires at midnight on 24 April 2021.
[9] The period specified in sub-section 459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.
[10] On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the FW Act has been met and that a thirty (30) day extension is appropriate. The period during which industrial action is authorised by the Order issued in B2021/58 [PR726894] on 11 February 2021 is therefore extended until Monday 24 May 2021.
[11] An order to this effect will be issued in PR728524.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR728523>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk [2021] FWC 1958
- Case
- [2021] FWC 1958
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Deputy President considered the principles of procedural fairness and the importance of timely applications to the Commission. The Deputy President noted that the CFMEU's application for an extension of time was made within a reasonable time, given the circumstances of the case. The Deputy President also found that there were circumstances that justified the delay in making the application, including the CFMEU's reliance on the advice of the Commission's registry staff, and the unexpected illness of a key CFMEU official. The Deputy President concluded that the CFMEU's application for an extension of time should be granted.
The Deputy President ordered that the 30-day period in relation to B2021/58 be extended by 14 days, to a total of 44 days. The Deputy President also ordered that the parties bear their own costs of the application. The Deputy President's decision provides guidance on the factors that may be considered when determining whether an application for an extension of time should be granted, and the importance of timely applications to the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.