Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Precision Painting Contractors Pty Ltd and Anor

Case

[2018] FCCA 1152

18 May 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Precision Painting Contractors Pty Ltd and Anor [2018] FCCA 1152 [2018] FCCA 1152 18 May 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia, constituted by Judge Neville, considered a dispute between the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and Precision Painting Contractors Pty Ltd and another respondent. The CFMMEU sought to enforce certain provisions of an enterprise agreement against the respondents.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the respondents had breached clause 11.1 of the Enterprise Agreement, which stipulated that the employer must ensure that any contractor engaged by the employer to perform work covered by the agreement is a party to a registered industrial instrument that binds the contractor to the terms and conditions of employment that are no less favourable than those contained in the Enterprise Agreement. The Court also had to determine if the respondents had breached clause 11.3 of the Enterprise Agreement, which required the employer to take reasonable steps to ensure that contractors engaged by them complied with their obligations under their respective industrial instruments.

Judge Neville reasoned that the respondents had failed to establish that the contractors they engaged were parties to registered industrial instruments that met the requirements of clause 11.1. The evidence presented did not demonstrate that the contractors were bound by agreements that provided terms and conditions no less favourable than those in the Enterprise Agreement. Furthermore, the Court found that the respondents had not taken reasonable steps to ensure contractor compliance with their industrial instruments, as required by clause 11.3. The Court applied the principles of contractual interpretation and the evidential burden of proof in enforcing the terms of the enterprise agreement.

The Court ordered that the respondents had breached clauses 11.1 and 11.3 of the Enterprise Agreement and that the CFMMEU was entitled to seek relief for these breaches.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Employment Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Statutory Construction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

  • Judicial Review

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

37

Statutory Material Cited

5

Dare v Pulham [1982] HCA 70