Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fusion Labour Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] FWCFB 5843
•18 SEPTEMBER 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fusion Labour Pty Ltd [2018] FWCFB 5843
[2018] FWCFB 5843
18 SEPTEMBER 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union versus Fusion Labour Pty Ltd, the dispute arose from the decision of Deputy President Masson, made on 26 June 2018 in Melbourne. The matter was appealed to the Fair Work Commission of Australia, with the appeal being heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The primary issue in the case was whether Fusion Labour Pty Ltd had contravened section 545 of the Fair Work Act 2009 by failing to pay a union member, who had been employed under an agreement, the applicable award rates of pay.
The Fair Work Commission had previously found in favour of the union, holding that Fusion Labour Pty Ltd had indeed contravened the award by not paying the union member the correct rates. The employer appealed this decision, arguing that there were no terms in the agreement that required payment of the award rates to the union member. The Court needed to determine whether the Commission's decision was correct in law and whether the appeal was well-founded.
The Court found that the Commission had correctly interpreted the award and the agreement between the parties. The Court noted that the agreement did not contain any specific terms regarding pay rates and that the award's provisions applied. As such, the union member was entitled to be paid the award rates. The Court held that the Commission's decision was not in error, and the appeal was dismissed. The Court's decision confirmed that Fusion Labour Pty Ltd was required to pay the union member the applicable award rates as determined by the Fair Work Commission.
The Fair Work Commission had previously found in favour of the union, holding that Fusion Labour Pty Ltd had indeed contravened the award by not paying the union member the correct rates. The employer appealed this decision, arguing that there were no terms in the agreement that required payment of the award rates to the union member. The Court needed to determine whether the Commission's decision was correct in law and whether the appeal was well-founded.
The Court found that the Commission had correctly interpreted the award and the agreement between the parties. The Court noted that the agreement did not contain any specific terms regarding pay rates and that the award's provisions applied. As such, the union member was entitled to be paid the award rates. The Court held that the Commission's decision was not in error, and the appeal was dismissed. The Court's decision confirmed that Fusion Labour Pty Ltd was required to pay the union member the applicable award rates as determined by the Fair Work Commission.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Restraint of Trade
-
Collective Bargaining
-
Industrial Action
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fusion Labour Pty Ltd [2018] FWCFB 5843
Most Recent Citation
Fusion Labour Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3774
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Marrickville Legal Centre
[2018] FWC 6874
Fusion Labour Pty Ltd
[2018] FWCA 3774
Marrickville Legal Centre
[2018] FWC 6874
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Fusion Labour Pty Ltd
[2018] FWCA 3774
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and Ors v CBI Constructors Pty Ltd
[2018] FWCFB 2732
McKechnie Iron Foundry Pty Ltd
[2010] FWA 3171