| [2022] FWCA 1369 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/1069)
SLA Nichols Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2020-2024
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 21 APRIL 2022 |
Application for approval of the SLA Nichols Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2020-2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SLA Nichols Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2020-2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.182(4) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU). The employer covered by the Agreement is SLA Nichols Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement.
The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 12 April 2022 and was determined on the papers.
There are three National Employment Standards (NES) issues that require comment:
· In respect of personal/carer’s leave, clauses 38.2(b) and 38.3(d) of the Agreement provide that if it is not practicable for the employee to give prior notice of absence, the employee will notify the employer by telephone of such absence at the first opportunity on the day of the absence. This appears to provide a more restrictive notice requirement than permitted by s.107(2)(a) of the Act.
· Clause 40.2 of the Agreement defines “family member” of an employee for the purpose of family and domestic violence leave, however it appears to exclude that close relatives of an employee can include someone who is related to the employee according to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander kinship rules, as per s.106(B)(3)(b) of the Act.
· Clause 41.6 of the Agreement provides the employer and the employees may agree, by consent of the majority of affected employees covered by the Agreement, to substitute another day for any public holiday prescribed in the clause. This appears to be inconsistent with s.115(3) of the Act, which allows for an agreement between an employer and an individual employee.
Clause 4.5 of the Agreement is an effective NES precedence clause, in that it states that where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. As a result of the NES precedence clause, the above clauses will not apply to the extent that they are inconsistent with the NES.
Upon my request, the Applicant provided evidence which satisfied me that the Agreement covers a genuine new enterprise and therefore meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.
In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMMEU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note that the Agreement was made with the CFMMEU, and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I am satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 31 December 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515759 PR740533>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 1369
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1369
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the fairness and compliance of the proposed enterprise agreement. The Commission needed to assess whether the agreement adhered to the statutory criteria set out in section 231 of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that an enterprise agreement be fair and free from any improper influence or coercion. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement complied with other relevant sections of the Act, including provisions related to the treatment of employees, the scope of the agreement, and the procedures followed in its negotiation and execution.
In reaching its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the terms of the proposed agreement and the evidence presented by both parties. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that addressed key employment matters such as wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It was observed that the union and the employer had engaged in a process of negotiation that appeared to be conducted in good faith. The Commission found that there were no evident procedural irregularities and that the agreement did not contain any provisions that were manifestly unfair. Consequently, the Commission concluded that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and registration.
Accordingly, the Fair Work Commission approved the SLA Nichols Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2020-2024. The agreement was registered as a valid workplace agreement under the Fair Work Act, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. This outcome ensures that the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement are governed by the provisions of the enterprise agreement, subject to any overriding requirements of the Fair Work Act and other relevant laws.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.