| [2022] FWCA 1799 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/1554)
CAVA SCAFFOLD SOLUTIONS PTY LTD SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND CORRECTIONAL PRECINCT STAGE 2 PROJECT GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2020
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 2 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of the Cava Scaffold Solutions Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Greenfields Agreement 2020
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Cava Scaffold Solutions Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Greenfields Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516139 PR742222>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 1799
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1799
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission considered whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission examined the evidence provided by the parties and considered the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the principles of good faith bargaining. The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
In approving the agreement, the Fair Work Commission noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits for employees, including improved wages and conditions, and that it provided for a transparent and fair process for the resolution of workplace disputes. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for a number of protections for employees, including protections against discrimination and unfair dismissal. The Fair Work Commission approved the agreement and made orders to that effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.