| [2022] FWCA 1909 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/1773)
THE TRUSTEE FOR EXTON FAMILY TRUST T/AS BRISBANE TILE & STONE SEALING (QUEENS WHARF PROJECT) UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 15 JUNE 2022 |
Application for approval of The Trustee for Exton Family Trust T/As Brisbane Tile & Stone Sealing (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as The Trustee for Exton Family Trust T/As Brisbane Tile & Stone Sealing (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement. It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 22 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516237 PR742542>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 1909
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1909
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the provision for the protection of employees' rights and interests. The Commission examined whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees, including provisions on wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and other conditions of employment. The court also considered whether the agreement adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its terms.
In delivering its decision, the Commission found that the agreement largely complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was deemed to provide appropriate protections for employees and included provisions that aligned with the principles of good faith bargaining. The Commission acknowledged that while some terms could be improved, the overall fairness of the agreement was not in question. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, recognising its value in providing a balanced framework for the employment relationship between the parties.
The Fair Work Commission approved the collective agreement, highlighting its compliance with the Fair Work Act and its alignment with the principles of good faith bargaining. The decision underscored the importance of fair and reasonable terms in employment agreements, ensuring that employees' rights and interests are adequately protected. The approval of the agreement signifies a resolution to the dispute and sets a precedent for future collective bargaining agreements in the industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.