| [2022] FWCA 2896 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/3388)
Waterworx Contracting Pty Ltd (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 24 AUGUST 2022 |
Application for approval of the Waterworx Contracting Pty Ltd (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Waterworx Contracting Pty Ltd (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517145 PR745097>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 2896
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 2896
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the collective agreement contained appropriate mechanisms for resolving workplace disputes and whether the provisions regarding employee entitlements, conditions of employment, and dispute resolution were in line with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The CFMEU argued that the agreement adequately addressed these areas, while the employer contested specific provisions, asserting that they were overly restrictive and did not comply with statutory obligations.
The Fair Work Commission carefully reviewed the provisions of the collective agreement, considering statutory requirements and the principles of good faith bargaining. The Commission found that while the majority of the agreement was consistent with the legislative framework, certain clauses regarding dispute resolution mechanisms and employee entitlements needed amendments. The Commission directed the parties to negotiate and revise these clauses to ensure they were compliant with the Act. The outcome was a revised collective agreement that met the statutory requirements, ensuring fair and effective workplace practices while preserving the intent of the original agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.