| [2022] FWCA 3489 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/4133)
SRG Global Building (Northern) Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020–2022
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 12 OCTOBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the SRG Global Building (Northern) Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020–2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SRG Global Building (Northern) Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020–2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 October 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517700 PR746628>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 3489
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3489
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed collective agreement met the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 for approval and registration. This involved examining whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Act and adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining, ensuring that it did not disadvantage employees or employers unduly and was in line with broader economic and social objectives.
In its decision, the court analysed the agreement clause by clause, considering its compliance with the legislative framework. It determined that the agreement did not contravene any provisions of the Act and did not impose any unfair conditions on either party. The court found that the agreement was a bona fide outcome of negotiations conducted in good faith, reflecting a balanced approach to the rights and obligations of both the union and the employer. Consequently, the court approved and registered the collective agreement, ensuring that it would be legally binding between the parties for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.