| [2023] FWCA 756 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2023/464)
BOYD PT PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Post-Tensioning Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 10 MARCH 2023 |
Application for approval of the BOYD PT PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Post-Tensioning Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BOYD PT PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Post-Tensioning Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 March 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519443 PR760162>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2023] FWCA 756
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 756
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the Commission needed to address included whether the agreement provided for a genuine enterprise bargaining process, if the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable, and if the agreement satisfied all mandatory provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also examined if the agreement appropriately dealt with issues such as wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Furthermore, the Commission evaluated the fairness of specific clauses regarding shift patterns, overtime, and the classification of employees.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was fundamentally compliant with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the bargaining process was genuine, the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable, and the agreement covered all mandatory provisions. The Commission highlighted that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and addressed the concerns raised by both parties. The Commission approved the agreement, recognising its balance between the needs of employers and employees. The Commission's approval of the agreement was based on its thorough assessment of the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed terms and conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.