| [2018] FWCA 2248 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2018/549)
MULTIPLEX AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD CONSTRUCTIONS WORKFORCE IN NSW
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 19 APRIL 2018 |
Application for approval of the Multiplex Australasia Pty Ltd Constructions Workforce in NSW.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Multiplex Australasia Pty Ltd Constructions Workforce in NSW (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 April 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428068 PR602141>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FWCA 2248
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2248
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address revolved around the compliance of the proposed agreement with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the agreement was in the best interests of the workers, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms, and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements set forth in the Act. Additionally, the court needed to assess the fairness of the terms concerning pay, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
The court found that the proposed agreement was generally in the best interests of the workers, providing fair and reasonable terms. It concluded that the agreement was sufficiently detailed and comprehensive, addressing various aspects of employment conditions and protections. The court also determined that the agreement adhered to the procedural requirements of the Act and was fair in its provisions for pay, working conditions, and dispute resolution. Consequently, the court approved the multi-enterprise agreement, facilitating a standardised and fair working environment for the construction workforce in New South Wales.
The court's approval of the agreement was based on its finding that the agreement met the statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable for the workers involved. The court emphasised the importance of such agreements in providing consistent and equitable conditions across multiple projects, thereby protecting the rights and interests of the workforce.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.