| [2018] FWCA 3872 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2018/2411)
AZZURRI CONCRETE GROUP PTY LIMITED / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 29 JUNE 2018 |
Application for approval of the Azzurri Concrete Group Pty Limited / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Azzurri Concrete Group Pty Limited / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 July 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE429027 PR608594>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FWCA 3872
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3872
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and the content of the agreement itself. It considered whether the agreement demonstrated good faith bargaining, whether the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable, and whether the agreement provided for appropriate mechanisms for dispute resolution. The Commission noted that while Azzurri Concrete Group Pty Limited did not oppose the application, it had not engaged in active support of the agreement, which was relevant in assessing whether the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining. Despite this, the Commission found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that its terms and conditions were fair and reasonable. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for adequate mechanisms for dispute resolution, meeting the requirements of the Act.
Having found that the agreement complied with the relevant statutory provisions, the Commission approved the collective agreement. The approval meant that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement would apply to the employees covered by the agreement, and would have the force of an enterprise agreement under the Act. The Commission's decision was based on its finding that the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining, and that its terms and conditions were fair and reasonable. The approval of the agreement was an important step in resolving the dispute between the parties and ensuring that the employees covered by the agreement had appropriate protections and entitlements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.