| [2018] FWCA 5689 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2018/4677)
Scaff & Co. Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| Commissioner Wilson | MELBOURNE, 11 SEPTEMBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the Scaff & Co. Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2018.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Scaff & Co. Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 September 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500090 PR700257>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FWCA 5689
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 5689
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the collective agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a lawful and effective collective agreement. This involved examining the agreement's content, the bargaining process, and whether it provided for the proper regulation of the terms and conditions of employment.
The Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering the scope of the bargaining, the nature of the terms and conditions outlined, and whether the agreement provided for the proper regulation of employment. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and covered matters appropriate for a collective agreement. The bargaining process was deemed fair, and the terms and conditions of employment were comprehensive and met the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, recognising it as a lawful and effective means of regulating employment between the union and the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.