| [2019] FWCA 4868 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2019/1934)
L & L CRANE HIRE AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018-2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 12 JULY 2019 |
Application for approval of the L & L Crane Hire and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2018-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the L & L Crane Hire and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2018-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 July 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE504421 PR710280>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FWCA 4868
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4868
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to determine were whether the terms and conditions proposed in the collective agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether they provided for the best interests of the employees and did not adversely affect the employer's capacity to conduct its business. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act regarding minimum entitlements and the protection of employee rights.
In delivering the decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed collective agreement did not meet the statutory requirements. The Commission highlighted several provisions that were inconsistent with the Fair Work Act, particularly those relating to minimum entitlements and employee protections. The court also noted that the agreement did not adequately address the specific needs of the workforce in the crane hire industry as claimed by the union. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the collective agreement, stating that the proposed terms were not in the best interests of the employees and would have a detrimental effect on the employer's business operations. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence presented and a careful consideration of the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.