| [2019] FWCA 8400 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2019/4639)
IDAHO WAY PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019 - 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 12 DECEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the IDAHO WAY PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the IDAHO WAY PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 December 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506449 PR715098>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FWCA 8400
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 8400
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the statutory provisions set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the agreement's fairness and compliance with the Good Faith Bargaining provisions. The Commission also had to consider the balance of rights and obligations between the parties, ensuring that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for all employees involved.
The Commission examined the negotiation process and the contents of the proposed agreement. It found that the agreement was the product of genuine and meaningful bargaining between the parties, with each side demonstrating a commitment to reaching an agreement. The Commission also determined that the proposed agreement met the legal requirements for approval, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, including provisions on wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it was in the best interests of the employees and met the requirements for approval under the Act.
The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed agreement, and it came into effect on the date of the Commission's decision. This outcome provided certainty and stability for both the employees and the employer, as well as ensuring that the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.