| [2020] FWCA 1153 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2020/404)
WHARTON CORPORATION PTY. LTD. T/AS ACTION ALLIANCE AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019 - 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 3 MARCH 2020 |
Application for approval of the WHARTON CORPORATION PTY. LTD. T/As ACTION ALLIANCE and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the WHARTON CORPORATION PTY. LTD. T/As ACTION ALLIANCE and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made the by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 March 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507291 PR717195>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2020] FWCA 1153
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 1153
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Wharton Corporation argued that certain provisions of the agreement unfairly disadvantaged its employees and were not in the best interests of the business. The Commission was required to consider whether the agreement complied with the good faith bargaining requirements and whether it contained provisions that were contrary to the public interest.
After carefully considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the enterprise agreement did not comply with the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission identified several provisions that were unfair and contrary to the public interest, including provisions that limited the ability of the Wharton Corporation to manage its business effectively. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not promote high levels of employment, workplace flexibility, or productivity, and therefore could not be approved. The application for approval of the enterprise agreement was dismissed.
The Commission ordered that the enterprise agreement 2019 - 2020 between the CFMEU and the Wharton Corporation T/As Action Alliance be disallowed and that the parties return to the bargaining table to negotiate a new agreement that meets the statutory requirements for approval. The decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are fair and promote the interests of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.