| [2020] FWCA 5796 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2020/3147)
PRECISION CONCRETE SCANNING CO PTY LTD (QUEENS WHARF PROJECT) UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 29 OCTOBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Precision Concrete Scanning Co Pty Ltd (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Precision Concrete Scanning Co Pty Ltd (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement. It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 5 November 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509391 PR724090>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2020] FWCA 5796
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 5796
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC was required to determine whether it had jurisdiction to approve the agreement. The legal issue was whether the employees of Precision Concrete were sufficiently connected to the City of Melbourne to allow the FWC to exercise its jurisdiction under section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The FWC found that the employees were not directly employed by the City of Melbourne, and the agreement was not made in the course of the City of Melbourne's activities. The FWC held that it did not have jurisdiction to approve the agreement as there was insufficient connection between Precision Concrete's employees and the City of Melbourne.
The FWC dismissed the application for approval of the agreement. The court held that the employees of Precision Concrete were not sufficiently connected to the City of Melbourne to allow the FWC to exercise its jurisdiction. The FWC found that the agreement did not fall within the scope of section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and therefore, the application was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.