| [2021] FWCA 1995 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/4562)
CONCRETE STRUCTURES GROUP PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2019-2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 13 APRIL 2021 |
Application for variation of the Concrete Structures Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Concrete Structures Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] A variation was made to the title of the Agreement and throughout the Agreement which replaces the original Agreement title “Concrete Structures Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022” with the following:
Concrete Structures Group / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2023
[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 13 April 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507346 PR728564>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 1995
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 1995
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues for the Commission to address were whether the proposed changes were genuinely required due to changed circumstances and whether the process for making the application was procedurally fair. The Commission needed to examine the evidence presented by Concrete Structures Group to support the need for the changes and consider the union's response and any potential impact on the employees. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the application adhered to the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act.
In delivering its decision, the Commission carefully reviewed the evidence provided by both parties. It found that the changes proposed by Concrete Structures Group were indeed necessitated by genuine changes in the business environment, such as market conditions and technological advancements. The Commission also determined that the application process was procedurally sound, as it had been conducted in good faith and with adequate notice to the union. The Commission ultimately concluded that the proposed changes were justified and approved the application for variation of the collective agreement. The decision was made in the interest of maintaining a fair and flexible workplace that could adapt to changing circumstances while protecting the rights of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.