| [2021] FWCA 2116 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/4547)
LEWIS FABRICATIONS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2020–2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 16 APRIL 2021 |
Application for approval of the Lewis Fabrications Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Lewis Fabrications Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 April 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511120 PR728726>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 2116
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2116
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties, and whether it contained appropriate mechanisms for resolving disputes and ensuring compliance. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, and whether it complied with any applicable awards or other industrial instruments.
After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, and that it complied with any applicable awards or other industrial instruments. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions, including the establishment of a joint health and safety committee and the inclusion of certain dispute resolution procedures. The respondent did not oppose the application, and the union did not appeal the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.