| [2021] FWCA 3805 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/5674)
ZLH PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SUBCONTRACTORS PLASTERING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020-2023
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 1 JULY 2021 |
Application for approval of the ZLH PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Plastering Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ZLH PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Plastering Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 July 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512045 PR731232>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 3805
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 3805
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was made in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, whether it included minimum terms and conditions that complied with the safety net, and whether the agreement was genuinely bargained. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement complied with the procedural fairness requirements under the Fair Work Act.
The Commission found that the agreement was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, as the parties had genuinely bargained for the terms. The agreement included the minimum terms and conditions required by the safety net and adhered to the procedural fairness requirements. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, acknowledging the fair and transparent process that had been followed in its negotiation and execution. The Commission's decision to approve the agreement recognised the parties' right to negotiate and finalise an enterprise agreement that suited their specific circumstances while ensuring the minimum standards set out in the Fair Work Act were met.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.