| [2022] FWCA 580 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/305)
GW COMMERCIAL FIXERS & GLAZIERS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2020–2022
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 21 FEBRUARY 2022 |
Application for approval of the GW Commercial Fixers & Glaziers Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020–2022
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the GW Commercial Fixers & Glaziers Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020–2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement. It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 28 February 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515037 PR738557>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 580
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 580
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the submissions of both parties and examined the terms of the agreement. The Union argued that the agreement provided for fair and efficient workplaces by ensuring that employees were paid fairly and had adequate rest breaks. The company argued that certain provisions of the agreement were not in the best interests of the business and its employees. The Commission found that the agreement was largely consistent with the principles of good faith bargaining and provided for fair and efficient workplaces. The Commission also found that the agreement did not unfairly discriminate against any employees and provided appropriate protections for employees' rights.
The Fair Work Commission approved the collective agreement with certain modifications. The modifications related to the calculation of penalty rates and the provisions for shift rosters. The Commission found that these modifications were necessary to ensure that the agreement was fair and efficient and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also noted that the modifications were consistent with the principles of good faith bargaining and did not unfairly disadvantage any party. The modifications were made to the agreement, and the Union and the company were directed to implement the approved agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.