Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Pilbara Ports Authority

Case [2025] FWC 2475


[2025] FWC 2475

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
v

Pilbara Ports Authority

(B2025/1326)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 22 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Pilbara Ports Authority

  1. This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union acting through the Maritime Union of Australia branch (CFMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Pilbara Ports Authority (Pilbara Ports or Employer).

  1. I note that the CFMEU, acting through its Construction and General Division, has made an earlier application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement, and the Order was granted.[1] The compulsory conciliation conference required in that matter has already been conducted.

  1. On 21 August 2025, the Commission was advised that Pilbara Ports did not, in effect, object to the Application if amended following discussions between the parties. The CFMEU advised the Commission a consent position had been reached between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Joel O’Brien, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Pilbara Ports, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 9 September 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790943.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1196.

[2] This is, in effect, 14 calendar days from the anticipated commencement date of the ballot, and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790944>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Pilbara Ports Authority [2025] FWC 2475
Case
[2025] FWC 2475
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, through the Maritime Union of Australia branch, applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Pilbara Ports Authority. This application followed a similar application made by the CFMEU in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement, for which a ballot order had already been granted. The current application was made after discussions between the parties, with Pilbara Ports indicating it did not object to the application if amended. The CFMEU confirmed that a consent position had been reached with Pilbara Ports. The Deputy President Hampton decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without a hearing.

The central legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements of section 443 of the Fair Work Act had been met for the grant of a protected action ballot order. This involved assessing whether the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employer and whether all procedural requirements had been satisfied. The application also required the Deputy President to determine the closing date for voting in the ballot, as stipulated under section 443(3)(c) of the Act. The Deputy President was satisfied, based on the material presented, that all conditions were met for the grant of the ballot order, and that the closing date for voting was appropriately set at 9 September 2025.

Following the determination, the Deputy President issued an order granting the application and setting the closing date for the ballot as 9 September 2025. The order also authorised Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd to conduct the ballot, as it had been approved as a ballot agent under the Act. Furthermore, the Deputy President assigned the matter to another Member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference required by section 448A of the Act, with directions to ensure meaningful negotiations. This comprehensive approach aimed to facilitate effective resolution of the enterprise agreement negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.