| [2024] FWC 2270 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
v
Brockman Engineering Pty Ltd
(B2024/1080)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 23 AUGUST 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Brockman Engineering Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Brockman Engineering Pty Ltd (Brockman or Employer).
I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU)[1] have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 23 August 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Corey Laux, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Brockman, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 7 October 2024[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR778619.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Respectively, B2024/1028 and B2024/1038.
[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order which is the minimum period required by the AEC.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR778620>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Brockman Engineering Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2270
- Case
- [2024] FWC 2270
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether the requirements for a protected action ballot under section 443 of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. This included confirming that the notification period for the proposed agreement had been met and that the CFMEU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Brockman Engineering. The Deputy President Hampton found that the CFMEU had fulfilled all the requirements based on the evidence provided.
The Deputy President Hampton granted the CFMEU's application and set the closing date for the ballot as 7 October 2024, which is the minimum period required by the Australian Electoral Commission. The ballot will be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission, and a compulsory conciliation conference will be held with the other related matters.
The orders issued by the Deputy President Hampton will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the conference and issue directions to ensure that the parties attend ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.