| [2024] FWCA 3523 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/3077)
BRC PILING & FOUNDATIONS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2023–2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 7 OCTOBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the BRC Piling & Foundations Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BRC Piling & Foundations Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
I note that the Agreement was made with the CFMEU and therefore covers this organisation (see s 53(2)(b)).
The Agreement was approved on 7 October 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526325 PR780006>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 3523
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3523
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to the application were whether the collective agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including compliance with the good faith bargaining obligations, and whether it adhered to the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the court needed to assess if the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees and whether it was negotiated in good faith. The CFMEU argued that the agreement reflected the needs of the workforce and provided adequate protections and benefits, while BRC Piling & Foundations Pty Ltd contended that certain clauses were not reasonable and should be disregarded.
The Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and the processes that led to its negotiation. It found that the agreement was the result of genuine and good faith bargaining, and that the terms were reasonable in the circumstances. The Commission highlighted that the agreement provided a comprehensive framework that balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees. It concluded that the agreement was fair and met all statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, confirming its validity and enforceability under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.