| [2024] FWCA 4333 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/4098)
WESTPOINT FORMWORK (AUST) PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2024-2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BELL | MELBOURNE, 6 DECEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Westpoint Formwork (Aust) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Westpoint Formwork (Aust) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Having regard to the material contained in the application and filed in relation to it, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 193 and 193A as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in sections 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 6 December 2024 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 December 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 July 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE527096 PR782114>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 4333
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 4333
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the terms of the collective agreement, assessing whether they complied with the statutory standards for enterprise agreements. The court focused on the procedural fairness, the absence of any provisions that were contrary to public interest, and the reasonableness of the agreement's terms. It took into account the balance of rights and obligations between the employer and the employees, the fairness of the terms to both parties, and whether the agreement promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations. The court also considered the need for the agreement to be sufficiently detailed and specific to avoid future disputes.
Upon careful review, the court found that the proposed collective agreement met all the necessary legislative criteria. The terms of the agreement were deemed fair and reasonable, and no provisions were identified that were contrary to the public interest. The agreement was found to promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations, thereby warranting approval. The court granted the application for approval of the collective agreement, ensuring its implementation for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.