| [2025] FWCA 3312 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2025/3168)
F.G PAINTING & DECORATING PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2024-2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 1 OCTOBER 2025 |
Application for approval of the F.G Painting & Decorating Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the F.G Painting & Decorating Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027 (Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 October 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 July 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE530641 PR792301>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2025] FWCA 3312
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 3312
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the collective agreement, as proposed by the union, complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, considering the economic circumstances and the bargaining power of the parties. The court also needed to assess if the employer's objections to specific provisions were justified and whether these provisions were detrimental to the business's viability.
In its decision, the court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties. The court acknowledged the union's position that the agreement was fair and balanced, reflecting the needs of the employees. However, it also recognised the employer's concerns about certain clauses that could potentially impact the business's profitability and operational flexibility. After weighing these considerations, the court concluded that, while some amendments were necessary to address the employer's legitimate concerns, the overall agreement was fair and reasonable. The court thus approved the collective agreement with minor modifications to the contested provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.