| [2024] FWCA 1181 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/951)
ARROW ACCESS & SCAFFOLDING PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2023–2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 4 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the Arrow Access & Scaffolding PTY LTD and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Arrow Access & Scaffolding PTY LTD and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 April 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524066 PR773077>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 1181
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1181
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues addressed by the Commission involved whether the terms and conditions of the collective agreement were compliant with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and Fair Work Regulations 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement met the requirements for a valid enterprise agreement, including whether it was made in good faith, whether it was free from any improper influence or coercion, and whether it provided for the proper operation of the business.
The Fair Work Commission examined the proposed agreement in detail, considering the submissions from both parties. The Commission determined that the agreement was fair and reasonable, in line with the statutory requirements, and did not contain any terms that were contrary to the public interest. The agreement was approved, reflecting its alignment with fair work principles and its appropriateness for the specific enterprise. The Commission’s approval was based on the evidence presented and the overall balance of the agreement’s terms and conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.