| [2024] FWCA 2040 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/1827)
DELTA PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2023–2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 6 JUNE 2024 |
Application for approval of the Delta Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Delta Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2023–2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 8 April 2024 and the Agreement was made on 21 May 2024 Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Construction, Forestry, and Maritime Employees Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2027. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524884 PR775612>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 2040
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2040
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the disputed clauses were genuinely intended to be part of the agreement, whether they were genuinely intended to be binding, and whether they contravened the "better off overall test" under the Act. Additionally, the court needed to decide if certain provisions fell outside the scope of the Commission's approval powers. The legal issues primarily revolved around the interpretation of the agreement's terms and the extent to which the Commission could intervene to ensure the agreement met statutory standards.
The Fair Work Commission found that the disputed clauses were genuinely intended to be part of the agreement and were genuinely intended to be binding. However, some provisions were deemed to contravene the better off overall test, as they did not provide employees with sufficient benefits to outweigh the potential disadvantages. The court also determined that certain provisions, while contentious, fell within the scope of the Commission's approval powers. As a result, the Commission ordered modifications to specific clauses to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. The agreement was ultimately approved with the stipulated changes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.