FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited
(ACN 055 284 270) [2006] FCA 747CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LIMITED (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
QUD 100 OF 2003RARES J
24 MAY 2006
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 100 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LTD (ARBN 065 374 138)
APPLICANTAND:
J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
RARES J
DATE OF ORDER:
24 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1 Grants leave to the respondent to file in court:
(a) a notice of withdrawal of defence dated today.
(b) an amended Defence to the further amended Statement of Claim.
2Orders that there be determined separately and before any other matter, all questions of liability.
3Orders pursuant to order 2 that there be judgment for the applicant on the issues in the further amended Statement of Claim.
4Fixes the assessment of damages to take place on 5 June 2006 at 10:15am at Brisbane.
5Reserves costs.
6 Grants the parties liberty to apply on 24 hours notice.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 100 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LTD (ARBN 065 374 138)
APPLICANTAND:
J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
RARES J
DATE:
24 MAY 2006
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)
In these proceedings a hearing has been fixed, commencing 5 June 2006. Today following earlier indications that it would do so, the respondent has filed a notice of withdrawal of its defence and an amended defence so that, apart from the traverse as to damages provided for in O 11 r 13, there is no issue between the parties that requires further adjudication by the court.
In those circumstances it appears to me it would be appropriate to make an order pursuant to O 29 r 2 that all questions of liability be determined separately and in advance of the assessment of damages. I make that order.
Having regard to the withdrawal of the defence and the admissions thereby made as to the applicant's claim, I am of opinion that it is appropriate to make an order that there be judgment entered for the applicant on its claim with damages to be assessed.
I will, accordingly, make such an order and I will fix the assessment of damages to take place on 5 June 2006 at Brisbane.
I reserve costs.
I grant leave to the respondent to file in court an amended defence to the further amended statement of claim.
I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Rares. Associate:
Dated: 15 June 2006
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S Thompson SC with Mr T Sullivan Solicitor for the Applicant: Thynne & MacCartney Solicitor for the Respondent: Colin Biggers & Paisley Date of Hearing: 24 May 2006 Date of Judgment: 24 May 2006
- AGLC
- Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited [2006] FCA 747
- Case
- [2006] FCA 747
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court granted the respondent leave to file a notice of withdrawal of its defence and an amended defence, acknowledging the respondent's admissions as to the applicant's claims. Justice Rares ordered that all questions of liability be determined separately and before the assessment of damages. The court also ordered that judgment be entered for the applicant on its claims, with damages to be assessed. The assessment of damages was fixed to take place on 5 June 2006 at Brisbane. Justice Rares reserved the issue of costs and granted the parties liberty to apply on 24 hours notice.
In summary, the court granted the respondent leave to withdraw its defence and file an amended defence, ordered that liability issues be determined separately from damages, and directed judgment for the applicant on the claims with damages to be assessed at a later date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: RARES J
Full text does not contain this section.