Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited

Case [2006] FCA 747


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited
(ACN 055 284 270)   [2006] FCA 747

CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LIMITED (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
QUD 100 OF 2003

RARES J
24 MAY 2006
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 100 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LTD (ARBN 065 374 138)
APPLICANT

AND:

J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE OF ORDER:

24 MAY 2006

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT:

1         Grants leave to the respondent to file in court:

(a)       a notice of withdrawal of defence dated today.

(b)       an amended Defence to the further amended Statement of Claim.

2Orders that there be determined separately and before any other matter, all questions of liability.

3Orders pursuant to order 2 that there be judgment for the applicant on the issues in the further amended Statement of Claim.

4Fixes the assessment of damages to take place on 5 June 2006 at 10:15am at Brisbane.

5Reserves costs.

6 Grants the parties liberty to apply on 24 hours notice.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD 100 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

CONSORT EXPRESS LINES LTD (ARBN 065 374 138)
APPLICANT

AND:

J-MAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 055 284 270)
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE:

24 MAY 2006

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)

  1. In these proceedings a hearing has been fixed, commencing 5 June 2006.  Today following earlier indications that it would do so, the respondent has filed a notice of withdrawal of its defence and an amended defence so that, apart from the traverse as to damages provided for in O 11  r 13, there is no issue between the parties that requires further adjudication by the court.

  2. In those circumstances it appears to me it would be appropriate to make an order pursuant to O 29 r 2 that all questions of liability be determined separately and in advance of the assessment of damages.  I make that order.

  3. Having regard to the withdrawal of the defence and the admissions thereby made as to the applicant's claim, I am of opinion that it is appropriate to make an order that there be judgment entered for the applicant on its claim with damages to be assessed. 

  4. I will, accordingly, make such an order and I will fix the assessment of damages to take place on 5 June 2006 at Brisbane.

  5. I reserve costs.

  6. I grant leave to the respondent to file in court an amended defence to the further amended statement of claim.

I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Rares.

Associate:

Dated:            15 June 2006

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S Thompson SC with Mr T Sullivan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thynne & MacCartney
Solicitor for the Respondent: Colin Biggers & Paisley
Date of Hearing: 24 May 2006
Date of Judgment: 24 May 2006
Details
AGLC
Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited [2006] FCA 747
Case
[2006] FCA 747
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Consort Express Lines Limited (ARBN 065 374 138) v J-Mac Pty Limited (ACN 055 284 270) [2006] FCA 747 was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, Queensland District Registry. The applicant, Consort Express Lines Limited, brought the action against the respondent, J-Mac Pty Limited, in relation to a dispute that was not fully detailed in the judgment. The primary legal issues before the court were the withdrawal of the respondent's defence and the subsequent filing of an amended defence, which resulted in the need to address questions of liability and damages separately.

The court granted the respondent leave to file a notice of withdrawal of its defence and an amended defence, acknowledging the respondent's admissions as to the applicant's claims. Justice Rares ordered that all questions of liability be determined separately and before the assessment of damages. The court also ordered that judgment be entered for the applicant on its claims, with damages to be assessed. The assessment of damages was fixed to take place on 5 June 2006 at Brisbane. Justice Rares reserved the issue of costs and granted the parties liberty to apply on 24 hours notice.

In summary, the court granted the respondent leave to withdraw its defence and file an amended defence, ordered that liability issues be determined separately from damages, and directed judgment for the applicant on the claims with damages to be assessed at a later date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

RARES J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: RARES J

Full text does not contain this section.