Companie Des Montres Longines, Francillon SA (Longines Watch Co Francillon Ltd) v Voxson Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2011] ATMO 82
•27 August 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Companie Des Montres Longines, Francillon SA (Longines Watch Co Francillon Ltd) v Voxson Pty Ltd [2011] ATMO 82
[2011] ATMO 82
27 August 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Voxson Pty Ltd, sought to register a trade mark, application number 1210749. The opponent, Companie Des Montres Longines, Francillon SA (Longines Watch Co Francillon Ltd), opposed this application. The decision was made by Iain Thompson, presumably in a capacity related to trade mark registration, such as the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The primary legal issue before the decision-maker was whether to register the trade mark application, having regard to the grounds on which the application was opposed. This required an assessment of the extent to which those grounds of opposition were established.
The decision-maker determined that the trade mark application should be refused. This conclusion was reached after considering the opposition. The decision-maker also awarded costs to the opponent on the official scale against the applicant.
The primary legal issue before the decision-maker was whether to register the trade mark application, having regard to the grounds on which the application was opposed. This required an assessment of the extent to which those grounds of opposition were established.
The decision-maker determined that the trade mark application should be refused. This conclusion was reached after considering the opposition. The decision-maker also awarded costs to the opponent on the official scale against the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Morgan Motor Company Ltd v Aero Investments Pty Ltd [2012] ATMO 91
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Babaniaris v Lutony Fashions Pty Ltd
[1987] HCA 19
John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1989] HCA 5