| [2024] FWC 3214 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Worley Power Services Pty Ltd
(B2024/1509)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 22 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Worley Power Services Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Worley Power Services Pty Ltd (Worley or Employer).
The Employer was sent a copy of the Application and the CEPU’s declaration in support of Chelsea Hill, Legal and Industrial Admin Facilitator but has not responded to the 6 attempts the Commission has made to seek its views in relation to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have discerned that the Application raises no issues for the Respondent and decided to determine the matter on the papers.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Hill, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Worley, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 December 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR781476.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR781479>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Worley Power Services Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3214
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3214
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the CEPU had met all the statutory requirements to organise a protected action ballot. This included verifying that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Worley. The CEPU provided a declaration from Chelsea Hill, Legal and Industrial Admin Facilitator, which detailed the union’s bargaining efforts with the employer and confirmed the union's genuine attempts to reach an agreement. Based on this evidence, the Deputy President was satisfied that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act had been met.
The Deputy President concluded that the union had met all necessary criteria to conduct the ballot and issued an order to this effect. The ballot was to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which had been approved as an eligible agent under section 468A of the Act. The Deputy President also determined that voting was to close on 6 December 2024, effectively establishing the ballot period. Additionally, the Commission assigned the matter to another member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, which would require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement. The member would also issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations took place.
The Deputy President issued an order for the ballot to proceed, and the matter was assigned for compulsory conciliation under section 448A of the Act. Further orders and directions were issued to facilitate the conciliation conference and ensure that the parties were prepared to engage in meaningful negotiations. This comprehensive approach aimed to resolve the dispute and prevent the need for protected industrial action.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.