Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Sydney Water Corporation

Case [2023] FWC 2392


[2023] FWC 2392

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

v

Sydney Water Corporation

(B2023/987)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 15 SEPTEMBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sydney Water Corporation

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sydney Water Corporation (Sydney Water or Employer).

  2. On 15 September 2023, the Commission was advised that Sydney Water did not object to the Application, subject to clarification about several proposed ballot questions.

  1. In the circumstances, I conducted a hearing to deal with this application and 3 related applications; being those made by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU)[1], the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA)[2] and the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU). [3]All applications relate to the same proposed enterprise agreement. As a result of discussions between the parties in and around the hearing, an agreed set of questions has been provided and leave has been given to amend the application accordingly.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Ivan Sheratt, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Sydney Water, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

  2. The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act [4]and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, and in consultation with the parties, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 29 September 2023.[5] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR7663001.

  2. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2023/977.

[2] B2023/978.

[3] B2023/979.

[4] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400

[5] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date effect of the Order

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR766300>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Sydney Water Corporation [2023] FWC 2392
Case
[2023] FWC 2392
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for an order allowing a protected action ballot to be conducted for certain employees of Sydney Water Corporation. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU), the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA) and the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU) made similar applications in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. Sydney Water did not oppose the CEPU application, subject to clarification of several proposed ballot questions. The applications were heard together with the other union applications, and after discussions between the parties, an agreed set of questions was provided.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach agreement with Sydney Water, and whether the requirements for a ballot were met under section 443 of the Act. The Commission was satisfied that the CEPU had genuinely tried to reach agreement, as evidenced by the declaration of Mr Ivan Sheratt, CEPU Organiser. The Commission also determined that all requirements for the ballot had been met, including the notification time and the appointment of an authorised ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS.

In light of the above, the Commission issued an order allowing the protected action ballot to proceed. The ballot is to be conducted by CiVS, and voting will close on 29 September 2023. The matter will now move to a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another Member of the Commission, along with the other related union applications. Further orders will be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

This decision provides an important update on the process for conducting protected action ballots in Australia, and the requirements that must be met under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission's decision to allow the ballot to proceed will allow the union and employer to move forward with negotiations for a new enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.